PROTOCOLS OF ZION APPLIED TO SUDAN! (Controlling Sudan?) [Archive] - Sudan.Net Discussion Board

بن رباح

06-Mar-09, 17:44

http://www.sudaneseonline.com/en216/publish/Latest_News_1/Sudanese_media_expert_warns_against_Zionist_plots_ targeting_the_Sudan_printer.shtml

Sudanese media expert warns against Zionist plots targeting the Sudan

http://www.suna-sd.net/file.asp?ID=612655

Khartoum, Feb 25 (SUNA)- Sudanese media expert based in Qatar, Salah Khogali, has stressed that the international criminal court's allegation against the President of the Republic was not targeting the person of President Omar Al Bashir but rather the Sudan as a homeland, its people and its independence. Khogali has pointed out in the Sudan News Agency SUNA Forum on Wednesday that a Zionist plot for which a committee of thirty military, political, economic, and scholars and experts was formed with a budget of some thirty million US dollars with the aim of toppling he government in the Sudan and that the issue was not related to Darfur nor was the issue the realization of peace in Darfur. He said it was an implementation of calculated intelligence plan. He said the Israel seeks to infiltrate into Africa and that for them Sudan was a fertile land. He said for that purpose they put a three phase plan targeting Darfur, South Sudan and the Blue Nile. He said the Ocampo memo was not a legal memo but rather a group of hearsay reports that have been collected from persons who received money so that they would say what has been inculcated to them. He said this was the first time such question would be tabled before the United Nations Security Council without a charge. He said the committee probing the claims has said there was no genocide in Darfur and that the Rome protocol has clearly stated in article 12 that there would be no case until the country signs the agreement and that there should be a written consent to this effect. He said the second point was that article 17 stipulates that the court shall not look into any case of genocide or crime against the humanity when the national judiciary is qualified to handle the issue. He warned that the Zionist plot has been set to be implemented even if the Sudanese conclude an agreement on Darfur in Doha and that measures should be taken because the issue is much greater than Darfur or achieving peace in Darfur. He said it touches the Sudanese people, their dignity and their pride and that the aim is to halt development and progress. He said with genuine will Sudanese could conquer that plot. He said in case of any indictment to be issued by Ocampo the Sudanese people should manage the crisis with wisdom through operation rooms and that Sudanese should make news, demanding Britain should make a diplomatic apology to the Sudan for what its invading forces did in Karary against the Khalifah of Mahdi who was massacred while praying. MA/MA

http://www.sudaneseonline.com/en216/publish/Latest_News_1/Sudanese_media_expert_warns_against_Zionist_plots_ targeting_the_Sudan_printer.shtml

-

بن رباح

06-Mar-09, 18:00

ماذا يريد الغرب من السودان؟

القاهرة – كثيرا ما جرى الحديث عن مطالب غربية تلقتها الخرطوم من خلف الستار مقابل تجميد ملاحقة المحكمة الجنائية الدولية للرئيس السوداني، عمر البشير (65 عاما)، لكن دون تحديد دقيق لهذه المطالب، التي يتزايد الحديث عنها مع قرب إصدار المحكمة قرارها غدا الأربعاء بشأن توقيف البشير، المتهم بارتكاب جرائم حرب وجرائم ضد الإنسانية وإبادة جماعية في إقليم دارفور غربي السودان.

"إسلام أون لاين.نت" استطلعت آراء مجموعة من الدبلوماسيين والمحللين السياسيين السودانيين حول المطالب الغربية من الخرطوم مقابل وقف مجلس الأمن الدولي ملاحقة الرئيس السوداني بموجب المادة 16.

وتتلخص هذه المطالب الأمريكية والأوروبية في ثلاث، هي: السيطرة على الموارد الطبيعية للسودان، خاصة النفط، وقف دعم الخرطوم لحركات المقاومة في الدول العربية والإسلامية، بموازاة التطبيع مع إسرائيل، أما المطلب الأخير، وهو فرنسي بالأساس، فيتمثل في عدم التضييق من جانب الخرطوم على النفوذ الفرنسي في غرب إفريقيا.

تمرد اقتصادي

ويقول دبلوماسي سوداني لـ"إسلام أون لاين.نت": إن "واشنطن والعواصم الأوروبية تجد صعوبة في التأثير على القرار السوداني؛ لأن السودان يمثل نموذجا اقتصاديا متمردا في إفريقيا، حيث لا يخضع كغيره من اقتصادات دول العالم الثالث لأدوات السيطرة الغربية الاقتصادية المعتاد، مثل المساعدات والقروض وسيطرة البنك وصندوق النقد الدوليين".

ويضيف أن "ما يزيد من صعوبة إخضاع السودان، موقعه الإستراتيجي المتميز، واتساع أراضيه، بما تحويه في باطنها من موارد طبيعية، خاصة النفط، في وقت تسعى فيه واشنطن إلى الاعتماد على نفط غرب إفريقيا والسودان بديلا عن نفط لخليج".

ويشدد على أن "الغرب يستغل المحكمة الجنائية الدولية لمساومة الخرطوم على استقلاليته الاقتصادية، وابتزازه عبر مشاريع نفطية وتعدينية يريد الغرب المشاركة فيها.. هناك مطالب أمريكية واضحة بالمشاركة في مشاريع النفط بالسودان، ومساع للحصول على نسب منه، ومنافسة الشركات الصينية وغيرها من الشركات الآسيوية، خاصة في الجنوب والغرب (دارفور)".

ويتهم هذا المسئول الغرب، وخاصة واشنطن، بقوله: "لذلك يؤججون الصراع في دارفور، ويستعملونه كورقة ضغط للابتزاز وللتدخل العسكري، ويحولون دون سيطرة الخرطوم على بعض أراضيها، مقابل مساعدة المتمردين على السيطرة على هذه المناطق".

المقاومة والتطبيع

ثاني مطالب الغرب، بحسب الدبلوماسيين والمحللين السودانيين، يتمثل في "وقف دعم الخرطوم واستقبالها لقادة في حركة المقاومة الإسلامية (حماس) في فلسطين، وحزب الله اللبناني، وقوى المقاومة في العراق وأفغانستان".

ويقول مسئول بالخارجية السودانية: "إن مطلب التطبيع مع إسرائيل يكاد يكون مطلبا متكررا في كل اللقاءات مع الدبلوماسيين الأجانب، وزاد عليه في الأونة الأخيرة مطالبة الخرطوم بفض يدها من دعم وتأييد حركات حماس وحزب الله".

ونكاية في هذا المطلب الغربي، يضيف هذا المسئول، شدد الرئيس البشير في خطاب له قبل يومين على أن "الخرطوم تؤيد المقاومة في فلسطين وفي لبنان وفي العراق وفي أفغانستان".

وصرح مصطفى عثمان إسماعيل، مستشار الرئيس السوداني، لـ"إسلام أون لاين.نت" في وقت سابق، بأن "واشنطن تربط إقامة علاقات (طبيعية) مع الخرطوم بأن يكون النظام الحاكم فيها مواليا للولايات المتحدة، وأن تخضع ثروات البلاد لسيطرة الشركات الأمريكية، إضافة إلى الاعتراف بإسرائيل".

ومقابل رفض السودان التطبيع مع إسرائيل، فإن حركة تحرير السودان المتمردة في دارفور، جناح عبد الواحد محمد نور، فتحت مكتبا لها في تل أبيب، ووعد زعيمها أكثر من مرة بفتح سفارة لتل أبيب في الخرطوم في حال سيطرته على السلطة.

النفوذ الفرنسي

أما ثالث مطالب الغرب من الخرطوم، فهو مطلب فرنسي بالأساس، يتمثل في "رغبة باريس في عدم تضييق الخرطوم على المصالح الفرنسية في منطقة غرب إفريقيا، وتحديدا تشاد المجاورة للسودان، حيث تطالب باريس الخرطوم دوما بعدم مساندة المعارضة التشادية المسلحة"، وفقا للدبلوماسيين والمحللين الذين استطلعت "إسلام أون لاين.نت" آراءهم.

ويؤكد هؤلاء أن "صراعا فرنسيا – أمريكيا، ضمن الصراع الفرانكوفوني – الأنجلو سكسوني، يدور في غرب إفريقي، حيث تسعى واشنطن إلى انتزاع السيطرة على المنطقة من فرنسا ضمن خطتها لتحويل هذه المنطقة إلى ساحة نفوذ إستراتيجية للولايات المتحدة، خاصة أنها توفر للغرب 22% من النفط".

ومع هذا الصراع "يضغط كل منهما على الخرطوم لحماية مصالحه في غرب إفريقيا، ولا يظهر هذا الصراع علنا؛ لأن باريس وواشنطن لديهما مصالح مشتركة في السودان، ودول أخرى".

وشدد هؤلاء الدبلوماسيون والخبراء السودانيون على أنه "في حال صدرت غدا مذكرة بتوقيف الرئيس البشير، فإن الغرب سيستغلها لزيادة الضغوط على الخرطوم لتلبية مطالبه الثلاثة.. فما المحكمة الجنائية الدولية إلا أداة سياسية بيد الغرب يبتز بها الخرطوم، تحت زعم حماية سكان دارفور".

واندلع الصراع في هذا الإقليم في فبراير 2003، حين حمل متمردون، أغلبهم لسيوا عربا، السلاح ضد القوات الحكومية؛ متهمين الخرطوم بممارسة التمييز بحقهم، وإهمال تنمية دارفور.

وبحسب منظمات غربية، فإن هذا الصراع أودى بحياة نحو 300 ألف شخص، وتسبب في نزوح حوالي 2.5 مليون آخرين من منازلهم، في واحدة من أسوأ الأزمات الإنسانية في العالم، غير أن الخرطوم تتهم الغرب بالمبالغة، وتردد أن القتلى نحو عشرة آلاف فقط.

-

molller

06-Mar-09, 18:12

Khartoum, Feb 25 (SUNA)- Sudanese media expert based in Qatar, Salah Khogali, has stressed that the international criminal court's allegation against the President of the Republic was not targeting the person of President Omar Al Bashir but rather the Sudan as a homeland, ....Khogali has pointed out in the Sudan News Agency SUNA Forum on Wednesday that a Zionist plot for which a committee of thirty military, political, economic, and scholars and experts was formed with a budget of some thirty million US dollars with the aim of toppling he government in the Sudan and that the issue was not related to Darfur nor was the issue the realization of peace in Darfur. [/CENTER]

Aha! So all the burnt villages and huts we can see in google earth are either a fake or the darfuris burnt down their own villages after receiving orders from the zionists? Aha! I see... Anything else?

kitayabi

06-Mar-09, 18:25

Aha! So all the burnt villages and huts we can see in google earth are either a fake or the darfuris burnt down their own villages after receiving orders from the zionists? Aha! I see... Anything else?

no but putting a big flame over every building that has experienced a fire in darfur,is highly misleading making it appear like darfur is constantly ravaged by flames.If google did a similair map for the UK for fires that have occured over the years it wouldnt look much different from darfur.

kitayabi

06-Mar-09, 18:27

moller no one has ever disputed that theres been fighting in darfur,but the whole point which you refuse to register is that the target is not civilian,though am guessing you know this but some people are just willing to put politics ahead of truth.

بن رباح

06-Mar-09, 19:26

http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2009/03/emergency-protest-london-hands-off.html

Ethnic Ashkenazim Against Zionist Israel

Thursday, March 05, 2009
EMERGENCY PROTEST LONDON: HANDS OFF SUDAN
[Until the ICC starts indicting Zionists, it simply has no credibility.]

Please forward!
SUDAN SOLIDARITY COMMITTEE

HANDS OFF SUDAN!
HANDS OFF AFRICA!

In 2003 and 2004, Darfur became the focus of an international crisis when rebel movements began a war in Darfur, in western Sudan. Tens of thousands of people have been killed in the fighting and many more have been displaced. The three Darfur states, the size of France, lie in the largest African state, the Muslim country of Sudan. Darfur itself has a complex tribal, ethnic and linguistic composition, and the complexities of the conflict have been magnified by international and regional interests. The disinformation and confusion about Darfur has been exploited by those such as the American government which has actively sought to destabilise Sudan and its government.

Western media coverage of the Darfur crisis has been both simplistic and inaccurate. It is also true that the actions and policies of Western governments and “advocacy” groups such as “Save Darfur” and the Aegis Trust have artificially been prolonging the conflict.

In response to pressure from powerful and well-funded anti-Sudanese and anti-Muslim lobby groups within the United States, the Bush administration falsely alleged that genocide had taken place in Darfur, against all the evidence, the opinion of the United Nations and African Union, the testimony of well-respected humanitarian groups such as Medecins sans Frontieres and international statesmen such as former American president, Jimmy Carter.

The latest attack on the Sudanese people has been launched by the self-proclaimed International Criminal Court. While claiming to be international, the simple fact is that it not – more than half of the world’s population is outside of its jurisdiction: Russia, China, India and the United States amongst many other countries including Sudan are not members of the ICC. The ICC is not recognised by Sudan, which has not signed the treaty which sought to establish the ICC. The ICC has predictably turned out to be a political rather than legal entity serving Western interests in focusing only on the African continent. The ICC has indicted and issued an arrest warrant for Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir on the basis of questionable allegations before an illegitimate court.

For all its claims to be the international court, the ICC is more accurately described as a European court – driven by Africa’s old colonial masters, Britain, France and Germany. For many Africans, the ICC is a new face for a neo-colonialism.

EMERGENCY PROTEST!!!

AGAINST ICC’S SELECTIVE JUSTCIE
HANDS OFF SUDAN!

Saturday 7th March, 2009
1pm (assemble)
United Nations, Millbank, London SW1P 3JZ
Nearest tube: Westminster

Join in solidarity with Africa

http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2009/03/emergency-protest-london-hands-off.html

-

haegar

06-Mar-09, 21:48

[ Controlling Sudan and the JCPA gathering

WORLD CONQUEST THROUGH WORLD JEWISH GOVERNMENT

They controll the sea also. They can make tsunamis and earthquakes. And the weather: Haevy Thunderstorms. They are responsible, if river nile has not water enough. AND THEY RULE THIS FORUM! Look behind you: Mossad is watching you.

Lina

07-Mar-09, 01:22

Good Job our brothers in UK , we look forward for your support :clap::clap::clap::clap:

http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2009/03/emergency-protest-london-hands-off.html

Ethnic Ashkenazim Against Zionist Israel

Thursday, March 05, 2009
EMERGENCY PROTEST LONDON: HANDS OFF SUDAN
[Until the ICC starts indicting Zionists, it simply has no credibility.]

Please forward!
SUDAN SOLIDARITY COMMITTEE

HANDS OFF SUDAN!
HANDS OFF AFRICA!

In 2003 and 2004, Darfur became the focus of an international crisis when rebel movements began a war in Darfur, in western Sudan. Tens of thousands of people have been killed in the fighting and many more have been displaced. The three Darfur states, the size of France, lie in the largest African state, the Muslim country of Sudan. Darfur itself has a complex tribal, ethnic and linguistic composition, and the complexities of the conflict have been magnified by international and regional interests. The disinformation and confusion about Darfur has been exploited by those such as the American government which has actively sought to destabilise Sudan and its government.

Western media coverage of the Darfur crisis has been both simplistic and inaccurate. It is also true that the actions and policies of Western governments and “advocacy” groups such as “Save Darfur” and the Aegis Trust have artificially been prolonging the conflict.

In response to pressure from powerful and well-funded anti-Sudanese and anti-Muslim lobby groups within the United States, the Bush administration falsely alleged that genocide had taken place in Darfur, against all the evidence, the opinion of the United Nations and African Union, the testimony of well-respected humanitarian groups such as Medecins sans Frontieres and international statesmen such as former American president, Jimmy Carter.

The latest attack on the Sudanese people has been launched by the self-proclaimed International Criminal Court. While claiming to be international, the simple fact is that it not – more than half of the world’s population is outside of its jurisdiction: Russia, China, India and the United States amongst many other countries including Sudan are not members of the ICC. The ICC is not recognised by Sudan, which has not signed the treaty which sought to establish the ICC. The ICC has predictably turned out to be a political rather than legal entity serving Western interests in focusing only on the African continent. The ICC has indicted and issued an arrest warrant for Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir on the basis of questionable allegations before an illegitimate court.

For all its claims to be the international court, the ICC is more accurately described as a European court – driven by Africa’s old colonial masters, Britain, France and Germany. For many Africans, the ICC is a new face for a neo-colonialism.

EMERGENCY PROTEST!!!

AGAINST ICC’S SELECTIVE JUSTCIE
HANDS OFF SUDAN!

Saturday 7th March, 2009
1pm (assemble)
United Nations, Millbank, London SW1P 3JZ
Nearest tube: Westminster

Join in solidarity with Africa

http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2009/03/emergency-protest-london-hands-off.html

-

Nubawi

07-Mar-09, 01:29

Controlling Sudan and the JCPA gatheringWhat an interesting mind you have, Bin Raah. Not an original one, granted, but so very interesting.
so next time blame the Zionist for Birds immigration!!
How fanatic are you ?

بن رباح

07-Mar-09, 01:59

What an interesting mind you have, Bin Raah. Not an original one, granted, but so very interesting.
so next time blame the Zionist for Birds immigration!!
How fanatic are you ?

http://www.strategypage.com/qnd/sudan/articles/20090217.aspx

The Man From Mossad Makes A Deal
February 17, 2009: Abdulwahid Elnur, one of the leaders of the Darfur rebel group SLM (Sudan Liberation Movement) has arrived in Israel and held meetings with the Mossad (the Israeli CIA). It's believed Elnur is providing information about Palestinian terrorist operations in Sudan. For decades, Sudan has provided sanctuary for all manner of Islamic terrorists. Apparently, if the SLM can provide Israel with useful information, Israel will provide SLM, and similar groups, with more support.

:geek:

بن رباح

07-Mar-09, 20:21

(This is an excerpt from David Rolde's research paper on the role of Israel and its supporters in Sudan. You may read the whole paper on the Bridge site at documents.)

Boston area Zionists organizing for war against Sudan

http://bazabaza.blogspot.com/2006/05/boston-area-zionists-organizing-for.html

Written by : David Rolde
Last modified 2006-04-29 05:59

On April 30th, supporters of a United Nations/U.S. military invasion of Sudan rallied in Washington DC. Zionist and proimperialist activists nationwide and in the Boston/Cambridge area are busy demonizing Sudan, repeating outrageous allegations of genocide” in Darfur against the Sudanese government and mischaracterizing the civil war in Darfur as being based on race or religion. The anti-Sudan rhetoric in the US media is intensifying.

The war in Darfur is not a religious war of Muslim against non-Muslim. Everyone in Darfur is Muslim. It is not a racial war of White Arabs against Black Africans Everyone in Darfur is a Black African. It’s not even a war of Arabs against non-Arabs Arabic is the lingua franca of Darfur and the language of education. Everyone in Darfur speaks Arabic.

One aspect of the war is a conflict over water and land usage between nomadic groups who subsist by raising livestock, and settled farming groups. These nomadic groups are identified by the US/Zionist media as being the source of the so-called “Arab Janjaweed.” These people are some of the most marginalized in the world. Towndwellers in Darfur, a region the size of France, have traditionally looked down onthem. and pejoratively labeled them as “Bedouins"—which is often translated into English as Arabs.

As American popular support for the war in Iraq has lessened, there has been a resurgence of anti-Sudan and anti-Iran propaganda. There is now a civil war in neighboring Chad. The mainstream media in the US has blamed the Sudanese government for the civil war in Chad.

Charles Jacobs’ Zionist groups

Boston is a world headquarters of Zionist activism, i.e., anti-Arab and anti-Muslim racist activism. Charles Jacobs is the founder of the pro-Israel propaganda group CAMERA and the David Project, groups that attack journalists and academics who write in favor of Palestinian rights. In the early 90s

Jacobs also formed the American Anti- Slavery Group (AASG), which exists to spread false allegations of slavery against countries in North Africa (Sudan and Mauritania) in order to demonize Arabs and divert attention away from Israeli crimes against Palestinian Arabs. A whole host of interconnected anti- Sudan groups now exists including the Sudan Campaign, another Jacobs-led group, whi ch advocates for divestment from Sudan.

Ane Zionist response to the movement to divest from apartheid Israel is to deflect attention to Sudan and a push to divest from Sudan instead. Harvard’s divestment from Sudan took the form of divesting from a Chinese oil company that buys oil from Sudan. Part of the reason for U.S. and Israeli attacks on Sudan is to try to stop China from obtaining oil.

The Jewish Community Relations Council (JCRC) is a national pro-Israel activist organization or coalition. JCRC Boston, the main organizer of opposition to the Somerville Divestment Project, ran buses from Newton to the anti-Sudan rally in Washington DC.
kNOw Genocide

On Friday, April 21, Boston-area Zionists, including members of the JCRC, co-opted a commemoration of the Armenian Genocide to have a rally announcing the formation of kNOw Genocide, an organization disingenuously purporting to oppose genocide around the world but in reality existing to propagate lies about the situation in Darfur in order to incite war against Sudan and hatred against Arabs and Muslims. Genocides perpetrated by Americans are not mentioned. Also conspicuously absent from the list is the Israeli genocide against Palestinian Arabs.
Michael Capuano

US Congressman Mike Capuano, a former Somerville mayor who now—badly—represents Cambridge, Somerville, Chelsea and 70% of Boston in the House, is a leading congressional hawks against Sudan. He is a founder and co-chair of the Congressional Caucus on Sudan. Capuano brags that he snuck in an amendment to an anti-terrorism bill to give $50 million more to the African Union military intervention in Sudan, that he has been to the UN recently to ask Kofi Annan to send UN troops to invade Sudan, that he passed a bill in 2003 denouncing Sudan fo slavery, and that he supports divestment from Sudan. At the same time Capuano isopposed to divestment from Israel.

I was able to discover that Capuano wrote a letter to the Somerville Board of Aldermen advising them to reject the proposal initiated by the Somerville Divestment Project, to divest from Israel. Capuano has taken trips to Africa, Iraq, and Israel. He admits that his trip to Israel was sponsored by the JCRC of Boston.

(This is an excerpt from David Rolde's research paper on the role of Israel and its supporters in Sudan. You may read the whole paper on the Bridge site at documents.)

-

بن رباح

08-Mar-09, 14:58

Sara Flounders: The attempt to control the resources of Sudan

http://www.youtube.com/v/Lu_WXEQGxOM&hl=en&fs=1

-

بن رباح

10-Mar-09, 00:25

http://engforum.pravda.ru/blog.php?b=54&goto=prev

Sudan and “The Israeli Connection”

Posted 08-03-2008 at 03:45 PM by shaukat

Israeli professor Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi in his book “The Israeli Connection” (1987) reveals that Israel has taken a direct or indirect part in almost every country where Muslim communities have been victimized - such as in Iran under Shah; Algeria under France; military support for former Ugandan dictator Idi Amin; training and arms for Kurdish rebels in Iraq; Philippines’ genocide of Muslim Moros; Mossad’s activities in apparthied South Africa; Ethiopian genocide of Muslims; support for military dictatorship in Turkey and Zaire; Morroco’s suppression of Islamic movement; military co-operation with India in occupied Kashmir; occupied Iraq; occupied Afghanistan; Bosnia; Russia; Uzbekistan, and so on. Israel was also behind the notorious Danish Cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and French roits under its Zionist interior minister Sarkozi (now president of France). The author also suggest that Israel is NOT a “surrogate of the US”, but does act as a “strategic asset” and a valuable ally of Washington when it comes to covert operations in Muslim world. He calls Zionism a “colonialism” - a system under which, in a defined territory, non-natives are entitled to political rights which natives are denied. Under Zionist-regime, a man from New York, whose mother happened to be born Jewish - has more rights than a Muslim or Christian native, whose ancestors may have lived in Palestine for centuries.

Currently, the Zionist-regime considers Islamic Iran, Sudan and Syria as great threat to its colonial empire in the Middle East. The Jewish Lobby in the US and other western countries are applying its muscles to push Christian armies to attack these Muslim lands and die for Israel. It’s using not only international forums like UN but also International Criminal Court (ICC) to target the elected leaders of those countries. For example, ICC’s chief prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo has demanded that Sudan’s Islamist president be indicted for genocide and crime against humanity. Interestingly, his conscienous never bothered him while seeing the Israeli, American, Indian or Russian leaders carring out genocide and ethnic-cleansing of Muslims under their rules. Interestingly, the US has still to ratify its membership to ICC - which it refused on the basis of not receiving amunity for US soldiers

A country size of France - Sudan’s 40 million population is 70% Sunni Muslims, 25% indigenous beliefs and 5% Christians. The ethnic conflict between Arab Muslims and African Muslims in Sudan is used by foreign powers to destable the largest Muslim African country for its oil resources (over 12% of world’s known deposits) and the fear of having another Islamic-regime next to Israel.

Southern Darfur, like Southern Sudan, is rich in oil. China\’s National Petroleum Corporation holds the largest oil concession in Southern Darfur. According to The Washington Post (Nov. 10, 1996) - Washington gave US$20 million to three African countries (Ethiopia, Eriteria and Uganda) collaborating to help over-throw the Islamist-regime in Sudan. The USAID was for surplus military equipment and military training mostly supplied by Israel.

According to some sources - there are 30 different armed groups fighting against the central government in Sudan. They’re supported by the US, Israel and some other western countries.

Canadian war correspondent Eric Margolis wrote in The Toronto Sun (August 15, 2004) - “Washington’s continued attempts to overthrow Sudan’s government (for Israel’s benefit) are making things even worse. Allow Africa to solve its own problems.”

Sudan has blamed foreign powers for using Darfur crisis as “smoke screen” to fool world opinion - as they did in cases of Iraq’s WMDs and Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

According to the book “Israel and Sudanese Liberation Movement”, published by Dayan Institute - “Israel adopted a strategy which they called ‘pulling the limps then cutting them off’. What this policy entailed was of building bridges with minority groups, pulling them out of national context and then encouraging them to separate through military conflicts. Tel Aviv hope that such strategy will eventually weaken Muslim world, break it down and threaten its interests at the same time. In order for this strategy to work, Israeli Mossad agents opened lines of communication and connection with Iraqi Kurds, Lebanese Christians and Southerners in Sudan.

According to Israel’s daily Ynet - 24 Jewish organizations are behind West’s Darfur phobia.

The Jewish Journal in its May 8, 2008 issue described the laughable Jewish attitude toward China’s holding Olympics 2008. While Israel maintains arms trade with China - Jewish Lobby is not happy with China’s US$2 billion investment in Sudan’s oil exploration.

-

Aviator1

10-Mar-09, 00:55

molller

10-Mar-09, 11:52

If google did a similair map for the UK for fires that have occured over the years it wouldnt look much different from darfur.

kitayabi

Have you seen any IDP camps organized in the UK due to distruction of towns and villages?

بن رباح

11-Mar-09, 02:45

by Keith Harmon Snow

The "Save Darfur" campaign is deeply aligned with Jewish and Christian faith-based organizations in the United States, Canada, Europe and Israel.

AU troops receive military-logistic support from NATO, and are widely hated. Early in October 2007, SLA rebels attacked an AU base killing ten troops. In a subsequent editorial sympathetic to rebel factions ("Darfur's Bitter Ironies," Guardian Online, 10/4/07) Smith College English professor Eric Reeves espoused the tired rhetoric of "Khartoum's genocidal counter-insurgency war in Darfur," a position counterproductive to any peaceful settlement. To minimize the damage this rebel attack has done to their credibility Reeves and other "Save Darfur" advocates cast doubt about the rebels' identities and mischaracterized the SLA attackers as "rogue commanders." However, there is near unanimous agreement, internationally, that rebels are "out of control," committing widespread rape and plundering with impunity, just as the SPLA did in South Sudan for over a decade.

Debunking the claims of a "genocide against blacks" or an "Islamic holy-war" against Christians, Darfur's Arab and black African ethnic groups have intermarried for centuries, and nearly everyone is Muslim. The "Save Darfur" campaign is deeply aligned with Jewish and Christian faith-based organizations in the United States, Canada, Europe and Israel. These groups have relentlessly campaigned for Western military action, demonizing both Sudan and China, but they have never addressed Western military involvement—backing factions on all sides. By mobilizing constituencies sympathetic to the "genocide" label and the cries of "never again" they do a grave disservice to the cause of human rights.

There is growing dissent within the "Save Darfur" movement as more supporters question its motivations and the Jewish/Israeli link. "Save Darfur" leaders have been replaced after complaints surfaced about expenditures of funds. Many rebel leaders reportedly receive tens of thousands of dollars monthly, and rebels emboldened by the "Save Darfur" movement commit crimes with impunity. There is a growing demand to probe the accounts of "Save Darfur" to find out how the tens of millions collected are being spent due to allegations of arms-deals and bribery—rebel leaders provided with five-star hotel accommodations, prostitutes and sex parties.

-

Lina

22-Mar-09, 02:50

up

..........................................

بن رباح

22-Mar-09, 07:35

UP:flag:

From: laroucheyouth
The U.S. Can Not Tolerate Bashir Indictment
http://www.youtube.com/v/OmgbESOw8To&hl=en&fs=1

-
-
-
-

Al-Bashir Attacks the British Empire

March 5, 2009 (LPAC)--Sudanese President Gen. Omar Hassan Al-Bashir addressed what Sudanese sources estimate to be hundreds of thousands of Sudanese citizens who gathered in the capital Khartoum to protest the International Criminal Court's decision to issue an arrest warrant against their president. Al-Bashir started by blasting the British Empire, invoking the fight the ancestors of the Sudanese people launched against the British in the 19th and 20th centuries, saying that that fight continues now against neo-colonialism. He thoroughly described how the Sudanese tried and punished the British empire for its crimes against the Chinese people and other Asian and African peoples by executing the British governor Gordon Pasha, here in the presidential palace (in 1885). Al-Bashir said that Gordon, who was known as Chinese Gordon, was famous for torturing and killing masses of people in China and Asia. He said the British never forgave the Sudanese people for doing that, and brought new armies and modern weapons to subdue the Sudanese people, but they resisted.

Al-Bashir gave an account of the many battles the Sudanese people and the different tribes and groups have fought against the British armies, which includes every part of the country in reality. Al-Bashir emphasized that this is what the whole issue today is about. They want to subdue Africa, stop its economic development and loot its natural wealth.

President Al-Bashir vowed to continue the development process in the country. He also called for establishing a new international front against the neo-colonial policy. He attacked the genocide committed by the British and other empires in Africa including the slave trade, the U.S. attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Vietnam War, the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, the Israeli war against Lebanon and Gaza, and said that all these constitute war crimes. He added that the perpetrators of these crimes come now to try the Africans. He said that the road to the invasion of Iraq was paved with lies and that the allegations raised by the ICC are just similar lies.

:flag:
-

بن رباح

22-Mar-09, 17:28

Scholars slam arrest warrant against Bashir

They can not even blame the Zionist criminals, let alone laying charges against them.
(IUMS)

International Union for Muslim Scholars (IUMS) yesterday slammed the arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court against Sudan’s President Omar Hassan al-Bashir as “motivated by political considerations”.

In a statement it said: “The decision of the ICC is just a new scheme to dominate the Arab and Muslim worlds and the whole Africa. It is only a way to revenge Sudan’s stances which the lords of the international community do not like.”

It also criticised the general prosecutor of ICC Luis Moreno Ocampo for what it described as “instigating the Sudanese people against their elected leader.”

“The ICC prosecutor went so far and committed an unprecedented act by calling for the implementation of the court’s decision inside Sudan’s territory. This is a call for the people to overthrow their elected government,” the statement added.

The IUMS also called on the Arab, Muslim and African nations to reject the ICC warrants on basis of “double standards.”

“The IUMS would like to remind the whole world of the double standards policy applied by several international organisations. The same applies to the American leaders who occupied Iraq. However, with al-Bashir the situation is different. They want to put him on trial just to revenge his country’s stances,” the statement added.

-

بن رباح

23-Mar-09, 11:04

-

Student Zionist group, Hillel, and Darfur

By Tony Logan
Hillel, the US’s most prominent student Zionist group, is actively pushing for US intervention against and into Sudan. On their web site which passes itself off as progressive and green, you will not find any concern for the people of Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq, Somalia, or Afghanistan. All these being countries currently being torn apart by US interventions into their affairs.

Instead, Hillel is all into encouraging the notion that US and British imperialism is a benign humanitarian thing for the peoples of Sudan to experience, just as so many other colonized and semi-colonized peoples have. Onward Christian and Jewish soldiers, I guess?

One local activist who is often times connected with the Pikes Peak Justice and Peace Commission through his work at Springs Action Alliance, is now celebrating Hillel’s work over at the University of Colorado in Boulder. There some students have erected a ’shanty town’ to ‘call attention to Darfur’. Some of these folk were Hillel sutdents for sure.

The Springs Action Alliance’s most recent newsletter called our attention to this ’shanty town’ constructed by a few students over at the UC at Boulder. This activist is concerned about Darfur. Good. He wanted us to know about this ’shanty town’ build for us to try to get our support for intervention into Sudan.

I guess though that this individual has forgotten about the segregated shanty towns of White Apartheid South Africa that Zionist groups like Hillel enouraged Israel and the US to accept for decades? He, and other local liberal Darfur fetishists seemingly are blind to the allies they sometimes keep, it seems. They focus on Darfur alongside at many times a rather mixed crowd, Zionists included. These Zionists of today want us to forget about Apartheid shanty towns, and to think that Muslims are putting people into shanty towns instead of Christian Whites, or Jews.

These liberals that push us to become more concerned about Darfur don’t seem to understand that we already are concerned about the violence there. We don’t need Hillel to ‘inform’ us of the problem. We don’t need the Carter Center folk either. We, too, are concerned with all the dying that is going on in that region of Sudan.

We don’t need Zionist backed construction of fake ’shanty towns’ at UC-Boulder to prompt our interest. We are against the continued bloodshed in that sad region of Sudan, Darfur, with or without Zionists and Israel pushing the issue.

Unlike the Zionists, both Jewish and Christian in the US, we don’t primarily hold the mainly Muslim government of Sudan to be alone responsible for the killing that has occurred there. We also don’t think that an increase in US-British govenrment directed intervention is the solution to what decades of British colonialism in the region has brought about.

More Imperial directed colonialism is not the solution to problems accruing from several centuries of European colonialism, even if it comes disguised as UN or African Union intervention instead of directly Brit and American.

Hillel and Darfur? How sweet their concern for Africa certainly is. It’s just not very sincere though. Instead, it’s little more than a propaganda tool they hope to use to gain support for more Israeli ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians off more of the Palestinian’s land.

Who are they really going to fool long term here? Their concern about any killing going on in Sudan is nothing more than a distracting device, to help keep people’s attention away from Israel’s own crimes committed with the help of the US government. If they want to worry about shanty towns, then worry some about those refugee camps both Israel and the US have created all over the Middle East. Until then, their concern about shanty towns in Sudan rings a little too false to me.

-

kitayabi

23-Mar-09, 11:36

http://jta.org/news/article/2009/03/03/1003421/darfure-still-on-the-brain-at-jcpa-plenum

Controlling Sudan and the JCPA gathering

http://jta.org/news/article/2009/03/03/1003421/darfure-still-on-the-brain-at-jcpa-plenum

----

The Protocols of Zion

WORLD CONQUEST THROUGH WORLD JEWISH GOVERNMENT

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion1.htm

-

were all aware that if sudan were to normalise relations with israel,sanctions would be replaced by aid.

بن رباح

24-Mar-09, 11:17

Stop the U.S. and Zionist War Against Sudan

by: David Rolde

The United States has been waging war against Sudan for the past 15 years, and we need to stop it. Just like with Iraq, the U.S. war against Sudan is a war for oil and a war for Israel. The proposed invasion of Sudan is based on lies. The lie of accusing the government of Sudan of “genocide in Darfur” serves the same function as the lie a few years ago accusing the government of Iraq of “possessing weapons of mass destruction”. The U.S. government, and its allies the Israeli and UK governments, are the real world champion purveyors of genocide and possessors of WMDs.

Sudan, the geographically largest country in Africa and the home of 35 million people, has been devastated by U.S. attacks for the past 15 years. In the early 90s the U.S. government declared Sudan to be a “state sponsor of terrorism” because the government of Sudan does not support Israel. The U.S. government imposed sanctions against Sudan.

The U.S. sanctions and trade boycott escalated in severity several times during the 90s and 00s and damaged the Sudanese economy causing immense human suffering. Throughout the 90s the U.S. government armed and funded the SPLA rebels in the south of Sudan in a war against the Sudanese government, and against rival southern groups, in which millions of persons were killed or displaced. Millions of southern refugees fled from the SPLA and now live in Khartoum, the northern capital. The culmination of U.S. support for war in Sudan was the so-called “Sudan Peace Act”, signed by George W Bush in 2002, which allocated one hundred million dollars per year to the SPLA.

One notable episode of the US war against Sudan happened in 1998 when the U.S. government of Bill Clinton, with a missile strike, destroyed Sudan’s only pharmaceutical plant, the al-Shifa plant near Khartoum. This rendered Sudan unable to produce needed human medications to treat endemic diseases such as malaria and also veterinary medicines needed by Sudan’s livestock industry which is a major part of the livelihood of the people of Sudan.

In 2004, during the U.S. presidential election campaign, the U.S. government started leveling false allegations of “genocide” against the Sudanese government in regards to the new civil war in Darfur in the west of Sudan. The U.S. media and pro-imperialist “human rights” organizations (such as Human Rights Watch which is controlled by billionaire George Soros and the Council on Foreign Relations) falsely portrayed the conflict in Darfur as a slaughter of Black Africans by a “White Arab” Sudanese government. In reality it was a civil war among many armed groups, some of which were supported by the US and Israel, fighting over limited resources in an impoverished region. Nearly everyone in Sudan is a Black African. And nearly everyone in Darfur is a Black African Arabic-speaking Muslim. The numbers cited for the “genocide” in Darfur were inflated estimates of how many people might die from famine and disease.

This year the propaganda against Sudan in the United States has intensified again. On April 30, 2006, the U.S. government in conjunction with U.S. Zionist groups, staged a large pro-war rally in Washington DC. U.S. congresspersons, as well as members of the Bush administration, spoke at the rally calling for the war against Sudan to be escalated by sending in an invasion force of U.N., NATO or U.S. troops. Nearly every pro-Israel group in the USA has anti-Sudan propaganda on the front of their website. In Massachusetts an example of a Zionist group doing pro-war activism is the Jewish Community Relations Council (JCRC) of Greater Boston.

The anti-Sudan rhetoric is no different than the rhetoric that the U.S. government uses against other countries that the United States is attacking. One aim of U.S. attacks against Sudan is to gain or maintain control over Sudan’s natural resources: notably petroleum but also uranium, other minerals, gum arabic, and the Nile River which supplies water to Egypt. China currently has access to oil from Sudan, and the U.S. government wants to cut China off. Destabilizing and impoverishing Sudan serves American and Israeli hegemonic interests to make sure there are no prosperous independent nations in the Middle East and North African regions.

But within the United States the anti-Sudan rhetoric is useful for more than just getting Americans ready for more overt war against Sudan. Anti-Arab and anti-Muslim rhetoric regarding Sudan is part of the general anti-Arab and anti-Muslim propaganda that is used to gain U.S. domestic support for the war in Iraq, continued U.S. support for Israel, and the so-called “war on terror”. Zionist groups in the United States have been purveying anti-Arab propaganda regarding Sudan for many years before the Darfur war, making false claims about “slavery” in Sudan. Slave redemption efforts in Sudan have been shown to be a hoax. Divesting from Sudan is a Zionist anti-Arab counter-proposal to the idea of divesting from Israel. Lies about Arabs divert attention from efforts to end Israeli apartheid in Palestine.

On September 1, 2006, the US rammed a resolution through the UN Security Council calling for tens of thousands of UN troops, ostensibly “peace-keepers” but really an imperialist invasion force, to be sent to Darfur to replace the current smaller US-puppet African Union force. On September 17, Zionists and other pro-war Americans held an anti-Sudan rally in Central Park in New York City. The keynote speaker at the rally was Madeleine Albright, Clinton’s Secretary of State, who is infamous for having admitted that the Clinton administration and the UN had killed half a million Iraqi children through the sanctions in the 90s but nevertheless defending the actions against Iraq as worthwhile. Rally attendees were asked to wear blue hats to signify their desire to send “blue helmet” UN troops to invade Sudan. These UN troops would not be “peace- keepers”. We can see the likely outcome by looking at Haiti where, in 2004, the US deposed the legitimate government and then sent in a UN occupation force which has terrorized the country and brutalized the Haitian people. When foreign UN soldiers get to Darfur and can’t determine which Black Arabic-speaking Muslims are the “bad Arabs” and which are the “good Africans”, the UN troops will kill people indiscriminately. The Sudanese people will rightly resist. The situation will escalate. US warmongers will call for sending more troops, including US troops, and bringing the war to Khartoum. It will be a disaster. The US war against Sudan needs to be stopped and reversed now.

Anti-war activists are not working hard enough to stop the US and Zionist war against Sudan. The current threats against Sudan are just as serious as the threats against Iran. Anti-war activists should be focusing more effort to stop the war against Sudan and to work against US imperialism in Africa in general - the current war against Sudan is just one manifestation of centuries of European colonialism and neo-colonialism in Sudan and Africa. The situation for the people of Sudan will improve once foreign intervention in Sudan stops.

David Rolde

-

بن رباح

26-Mar-09, 02:35

French Author Publishes Important Book About Kouchner

12-3-2009

A lot of the observers and international affairs experts have been wondering about the reasons of the new French foreign policy in which France blindly supports the Israeli-American foreign policy.

France, thanks to this new policy, has lost its own independent foreign policy that characterized France since the era of President Charles de Gaulle, who rebelled against American style of capitalism and established an independent French policy.

The famous French author, Pierre Péan, who published a book about the current French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner under the title “Le Monde Selon K”, has answered most of the questions about the relationship between the French and US foreign policy in his book.

The entire book speaks about the political background of Mr. Bernard Kouchner and the impact of this background on the foreign policy of his country.

The author devoted a chapter to speak about “Urgence Darfowr” organization, which was established to deal with Darfur crisis in western Sudan.

The book also tackled the big concern of the French Foreign Minister about Darfur crisis, attributing this concern to the relationship between Kouchner and a group of Zionists known for their hostility to Sudan and adoption of what it called the holocaust.

The relationship of Kouchner with these organizations has pushed him to establish the Urgence Darfowr in France.

The author said that Kouchner was one of the founders of Médecins Sans Frontière.

Kouchner exerted individual efforts to involve several persons in the organization such as Dr. Sasha who has a connection with the Jewish student organizations in France, the author said.

In cooperation with his Jew friend Pierosan, Kouchner established the (MDM) which played a vital role in encouraging the US to invade and occupy Iraq in the year 2003, the author said.

The principles of organizations of Kouchner are to guarantee the opinion freedoms for those who criticize the Muslims and Catholics and to ban those who criticize Israel from this right, the author.

According to the author, Kouchner was the first one who called for a military intervention in Darfur region.

This call helped him to succeed in the French election in 2007 after receiving the support of the Jews.

The author said that Kouchner, who called for holding international conference on Darfur in 2007, is using Darfur issue in full coordination with Washington and Israel as a tool to topple the government in Khartoum.

Perhaps, this new French policy is the reason behind the French intransigence toward Darfur crisis and its continuous attempt to obstruct Darfur peace.

http://sudanviews.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=673&Itemid=0
-

-

بن رباح

27-Mar-09, 10:48

Behind the ‘rebel’ movement in Darfur

n the aftermath of the conclusion of a civil war in the south of Sudan between the central government and the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) in 2003, violence then erupted in the western region of Darfur. The Darfur separatist movement consists of several groups including the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) and the Sudan Liberation Movement/Army (SLM/A). Since 2003, the SLM and JEM have splintered into several other groups. The Sudanese government says this splintering has complicated its efforts to reach a workable peace accord with the rebels.

Support for the Darfur separatist groups has been advanced by elements within the United States. The New York Times has run numerous articles and editorials that seek to build public support for direct U.S. intervention in Sudan.

Many of the organizations that have played a leading role in the so-called “Save Darfur” campaign also support the State of Israel in its continued occupation of Palestine.

Over the last two years, a well-financed campaign has been waged to build anti-Sudanese sentiment in the United States. A documentary film entitled “The Devil Came on Horseback” features a U.S. military officer who went to Darfur ostensibly as a monitor with the African Union peacekeeping force. The film shows atrocities committed in Darfur and appeals for military involvement by the West in Sudan.

A Feb. 17 article published in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported that a Darfur rebel movement leader visited Israel for high-level meetings with Israeli officials. This article also illustrates the base of support that exists among European imperialist powers for the Darfur campaign.

The Haaretz article states, “Abdel Wahid al-Nur is the head of the Sudan Liberation Movement. While in Israel, he met with the senior [Israeli] official and discussed with him the ongoing conflict in Sudan.”

According to the article “Al-Nur came to Israel earlier this month at his own initiative, to attend the annual Herzliya Conference. He came with a group of European Jews, most of them French, who have been active on behalf of the Darfur refugees.”

This article goes on to point out that “Al-Nur fled to France in 2007 and has not been back to Sudan since then. ... In the past, he has spoken in favor of establishing diplomatic ties between Sudan and Israel, and a year ago, he even announced that his movement was opening an office in Tel Aviv, staffed by Sudanese refugees....”

-

بن رباح

27-Mar-09, 20:35

Zionists shedding crocodile tears.

Zionists Praise for ICC’s Warrant for Sudan President

By Eric Fingerhut · February 12, 2009

WASHINGTON (JTA) -- Two Jewish groups are praising the International Criminal Court's decision to issue an arrest warrant for Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir.

The Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism called it a "step toward justice both in Sudan and in the international fight for human rights."
(are you kidding me?) :roll::roll::roll:

"By calling for President Bashir's arrest, the ICC has made a statement that no perpetrator of genocide, even a head of state, is free from accountability for his or her actions," said RAC director Rabbi David Saperstein.

The American Jewish World Service signed on to a statement as part of the Save Darfur Coalition which stated that the warrant "will likely add international legal weight to a long obvious truth -- primary responsibility for the atrocities in Darfur rests with the regime that Bashir heads."

The coalition urged the international community to "make absolutely clear that the Government of Sudan will be held responsible for any preemptive or retaliatory action against civilians, humanitarian aid workers, or United Nations and African Union peacekeeping forces" and focus renewed diplomatic efforts on building a lasting and inclusive peace for all of Sudan. It also urged Sudanese authorites to cooperate with the court.

-
-
-

Rivers of blood are being shed by Zionists everyday in occupied Palestine.

Human rights, eh!

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/11/08/beithanun_wideweb__470x314,0.jpg

http://www.worldproutassembly.org/images/beit-1005.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_UeBioofldTc/SYu6KvaMZ-I/AAAAAAAADNw/x0ngEyZF-x4/S269/Palestine+Chronicle+bloody_hand_wafaali_jazeera.jp g

-

RAM~MI~RAN

27-Mar-09, 21:03

بن رباح

28-Mar-09, 12:19

لقاء سرّي بين عاموس جلعاد ورئيس حركة تحرير السودان في تل ابيب

http://www.addounia.tv/archive/docs/Image/amos-gilad-israel.jpg

كشفت صحيفة هآرتس الإسرائيلية اليوم الاثنين أنّ عبد الواحد محمد نور زعيم (حركة تحرير السودان) طالب إسرائيل بدعم ميليشياته في مواجهة الجيش السوداني في إقليم دارفور.

وحسب الصحيفة فإنّ محمد نور التقى رئيس الهيئة السياسية والأمنية في وزارة الحرب الإسرائيلية عاموس جلعاد، خلال زيارته السرّية إلى إسرائيل مطلع الشهر الحالي.

وأضافت الصحيفة أنّ محمد نور وبمبادرة شخصية منه، غادر من العاصمة الفرنسية باريس إلى إسرائيل برفقة مجموعة من يهود أوروبا للمشاركة في مؤتمر هيرتسيليا في تل أبيب.

وتعقيباً على اللقاء الذي جمع جلعاد ومحمد نور، أوضحت وزارة الحرب الإسرائيلية أنّّّّّّّّ عدة لقاءات تمّت من أجل (الأمن القومي)، دون إعطاء أيّة تفاصيل حول تلك الاجتماعات.

وكانت تقارير إعلامية كشفت عن أنّ إسرائيل هددت بإغلاق مكتب حركة تحرير السودان وإيقاف الدعم المادي والعسكري في حال مشاركة الحركة في مباحثات الدوحة.

-

بن رباح

28-Mar-09, 21:20

-

Neoconservative Nicholas D. Kristof, thinking loudly about invading Sudan while in contact with a so called aid worker in sudan!

Should We Talk About Invading Sudan?
By Nicholas D. Kristof

I’m regularly asked questions along these lines: If Darfur is so awful, then shouldn’t we just go in with guns blazing and rescue the people?

I’m sympathetic to that view, as are many others – and yet the idea of non-consensual troop deployment is something that is almost never discussed in relation to Darfur. In theory, the international community accepts a “responsibility to protect” people from genocide. And in theory the Genocide Convention of 1948 also obliges us to take some action. And yet nobody is talking about humanitarian military intervention – including me, at least in my column space.

One reason is that it’s simply not going to happen. There is some chance that the international community will provide enough food and medical care to keep Darfuris alive, but there is zero chance that NATO or the U.S. or anyone else will go in against Sudan’s wishes (at least in circumstances anything like the present). So it seems more useful to use one’s political capital to achieve things that are achievable, rather than to push for things that are impossible.

It could be argued, I suppose, that raising the possibility of a humanitarian invasion might keep Sudan on its toes and lead it to behave better. After all, Sudan cooperated with us on terror financing after 9/11 in part because it seemed genuinely nervous that we might do something terrible to it. Likewise, one could argue that even if raising the idea of an invasion may not help Darfuris, it’s useful to put it on the table so that it may help victims of the next genocide.

John Weiss of Cornell has, in particular, argued for a more muscular response to genocide in Darfur, noting that everything else has pretty much failed. He’s involved in a conference this very weekend in Bosnia on aspects of a “Plan B” – the forceful response – to stop genocide. There’s more information at Darfur International Action’s website.

Ultimately, though, I’ve been persuaded by people in Sudan – both aid workers and Sudanese natives, Darfuris and non-Darfuris alike – that pushing for a military intervention is actually counter-productive. Not only is it just not going to happen, but the talk about it ends up bolstering President Bashir and painting him as a nationalist to his people. That’s particularly the case in the aftermath of the Iraq war, when there’s a tendency to see any American military move as a plot to protect Israel or seize Arab oil.

An aid worker in Sudan e-mailed me today to make a similar point. He wrote: “I have been alarmed recently by some calls for ‘forced intervention’ and rather tough military actions against the Sudanese government. I find them alarming because I think they: a) are hollow threats that theats that the USG and NATO are not at all likely to follow through on. Therefore, b) the government sees through the bluff and is able to use it to raise local passions against foreign aggression, neo-colonialism, zionism, etc. and c) they provide false hope to rebel groups that if they just hold out longer they may get a lot of foreign military help and a much better deal than they could currently win at a negotiating table.”

Likewise, several Sudanese journalists have pleaded with me not to talk about military intervention, because they believe that President Bashir just uses such talk as an excuse to repress dissent.

In addition, there’s also reason to worry that American politicians won’t raise the issue of Darfur if they think that American troops might be deployed. And it’s a little awkward to argue for forcible military intervention by, say, Canadian and French troops while Americans cheer them on. It’s better to have Americans pushing for an end to the genocide than sitting on their hands because they fear that we could risk our troops. Throughout the history of genocide, one problem has been that because perfect solutions are not available, nothing is done – and we don’t want that to happen again.

So in the end I side with them. I wish that the international community were ready to intervene to stop a slow-motion genocide in Africa, but for now I’m afraid that such talk doesn’t accomplish anything other than bolstering Bashir. So our political capital is better used pushing for things that are plausible, such as a no-fly zone and diplomatic pressure on all sides to reach a peace agreement.

There’s one exception, though, and I alluded to it in today’s column. There is some possibility that Sudan will unleash the Janjaweed on the various camps in Sudan and Chad – starting with Kalma, the biggest. If that were to happen and hundreds of thousands of people risked being machine gunned, we would have to go in militarily, over Sudan’s objections, and create a corridor to bring them out to safety in Chad or southern Sudan.

-

بن رباح

29-Mar-09, 01:19

The Roots of Christian Zionism, Part I, The Cause of the Conflict
by: Charles E. Carlson

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c219/talk2action/armageddon_best3.jpg

America’s war based economy depends on Christians’ support.

The following are exerpts:

Christian Zionists, by whatever name, are the primary public enablers of serial wars upon Islamic states. Why? Because they have been conditioned to think of Islam as an anathema to them, much as many of us were trained to consider communists our ideological enemies a generation ago. Most Christian celebrity media leaders have allowed themselves to be used as propagandists against Islamic states with independent governments, including Iraq, Palestine, Afghanistan, Somalia, Bosnia, and in the future, Islamic states of Iran and Sudan. Our purpose is to examine why and how this has been done, why it is wrong and what can be done to correct it.

....

At the apex of the Christian Zionist sect (which is only 100 years old) are leaders who include media personalities such as John Hagee, Rod Parsley, Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell, Benny Hinn, Joyce Meyer, and hundreds more. Each has openly expressed the view that war upon Islamic states is necessary and welcome. Currently, most of these call for America’s next planned serial war against Iran. Sudan is also on the war agenda.

......

Orthodox or traditional Christians have always believed that Jesus, not Israel is the correct answer. Only Christian Zionism (by definition) assumes that political Israel is in God’s plan for the future, and that in spite of its intolerance, racism, and constant wars, political Israel is the chosen people of God.

Source:
http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2008/12/08/the-roots-of-christian-zionism-part-i-th

-

بن رباح

29-Mar-09, 04:30

-

The game of how the fate of other nations is decided.
:roll::roll::roll:

Time to Talk of CIA Regime Change in Sudan?

By Jeff Stein, CQ Staff

It was only a matter of time before somebody started talking about “regime change” in Sudan. For all the right reasons, of course: to stop the bloodletting in Darfur. Intervention is always high-minded, isn’t it?

No less than Mr. Axis-of Evil himself, Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson, is advocating “a thoughtful strategy that leads, step by step, to a government in Sudan that values the people of Darfur. . . .”

“This does not necessarily mean regime change,” Gerson wrote in his March 25 Washington Post column, “but it probably requires Bashir change — the emergence of a Sudanese leadership willing to start anew.”

Decapitation is the term of art. Since military intervention is out of the question (for too many reasons to list here), I guess that means calling in the CIA. You can’t use the Peace Corps for this.

Something like the Iran op in 1953, I guess he’s thinking. It was relatively bloodless. The CIA worked so fast in the overthrow of the socialist Mohammed Mossadeq the shah hardly had time to pin the medals on his jacket. Iran’s oil was safely back in our hands, for about 25 years. Nothing last forever.

“I’m a great believer in covert action,” says a veteran CIA station chief who retired a few years ago (and never lets me use his name). “By that I don’t mean sending military people in there and killing everybody. Something more subtle . . . Doing things that weaken the dictatorship’s control of the media is good.”

You fabricate unflattering articles for the newspapers and radio stations. At its best, people begin to laugh at the dictator. He’s toast.

But you need somebody to replace him. (Tyrants are so 20th century) Someone like Lech Walesa, the Solidarity union leader in Poland. The roughly handsome, mustachioed shipyard worker was a poster boy for democracy.

Walesas are rare.

“The problem is finding a guy the State Department approves of,” says the former station chief. “They always want a ‘moderate.’ They complained that the guys we used to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan were bad guys, and we should use ‘moderates.’ Well, we said, ‘Great, but the problem with moderates is that they don’t fight, and they can’t run the country.’ You end up with guys like [Afghan President Hamid] Karzai or Ahmad Chalabi [the neocon-backed Iraqi exile who fed phony intelligence to the White House and news media].

“They picked those guys and look what’s happened,” he said. “They want some guy in Florida who speaks English, has a beard and wears a turban and wants to go home.”

Coups usually have bad, long-term consequences, argues Haviland Smith, who was involved with Iran and spent a career working against the Soviet Union.

“Try to find any example of a covert op (regime change) that ultimately ended up favorable to the USA,” Smith said in an e-mail Friday. He pointed me to a piece he just published in American Diplomacy on the same subject.

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=hsnews-000003087499

Stephen Kinzer - America's century of regime change (5 of 8 )

http://www.youtube.com/v/XN95TKwNm4U&hl=en&fs=1

-

بن رباح

29-Mar-09, 13:41

Do Dems want to invade Sudan?

http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/images/iraqdeaths.gif

http://www.youtube.com/v/ek_C4vrXEqo&hl=en&fs=1

-
-
-
-

US Genocide in Iraq

Dr Ian Douglas
with Abdul Ilah Albayaty and Hana Al Bayaty

http://www.brusselstribunal.org/pdf/NotesOnGenocideInIraq.pdf

-

بن رباح

30-Mar-09, 03:56

The Crusades Continued Through Israel

Nubia

Nubia was located in what today is northern Sudan, along the Nile River. According to this verse, this land (eretz in Hebrew) will be brought into submission (verse 11:43). This has not yet happened because the current government of Sudan has not yet been brought into submission by the West. I predict that the US will bring Sudan into submission. Let us watch how this prediction will be fulfilled. The current issues in Darfur will very likely cause the Western powers to become more involved in Sudan's sovereign teritory.

If we look at recent history, we can see that the Northern Alliance is slowly, but surely, taking control of Palestine and the rest of the Muslim countries in the region either by military force (Afganistan and Iraq) or by economic coercion. By buying the oil of countries such as Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, by providing economic assistance to countries like Egypt and Yemen, by establishing economic sanctions against countries such as Libya and Iran, the US, with varying support from its western allies, is breaking the will of the Muslim countries that will not make peace with Israel. Peace in the region ultimately means coming to terms with the "god of fortresses." There was a time when the USSR provided a balance of power by helping Arab leaders such as Gamal Nasser of Egypt. But those days are gone.

From:The Crusades Continued Through Israel

http://www.danielcode.com/Ch6.htm

-

بن رباح

31-Mar-09, 10:50

-
Is George Soros a Modern Rumpelstiltskin?

This statement was released by the LaRouche Political Action Committee on March 4, immediately following the issue of an arrest warrant by the International Criminal Court for Sudan's Head of State, President Omar Hassan al-Bashir. PDF version of this article includes graphics.

Today's legally dubious, and probably fraudulent indictment of Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, by the International Criminal Court (ICC), on the warrant co-uttered by a private tribunal funded heavily by megaspeculator George Soros, once again recommends scrutiny of Soros. This has led Lyndon LaRouche to ask: "Is George Soros a Modern Rumpelstiltskin?"

Look back to the terribly shocking admissions which came out of Soros's own mouth during a CBS 60 Minutes interview of Soros, by Steve Kroft, on Dec. 20, 1998.

Britain's own Hungarian Jewish emigré Soros is known, by his own admission, to have had his character shaped, still today, by his experience during the Nazi occupation of his native land. Then, by his own admission, during those awful months, teenager Soros had been employed as a supposed gentile, in assisting the implementation the Nazi program of looting, and then exterminating, Soros's own fellow Jews.

What came out of Soros's mouth in that interview was a set of cold-blooded admissions which should have shocked any reader of celebrated U.S. journalist Ben Hecht's account given in a former best-seller documentary, Perfidy!, on the Eichmann case.

When Soros was questioned by Kroft, as to how he reacted to this experience as a teen-age runner for the Eichmann apparatus, Soros displayed not only his total lack of conscience at the time, but insisted, still in 1998, on justifying, still today, what he had done for the Eichmann apparatus back then.

That CBS interview elicited from Soros's autobiographical accounts, presented an image of Soros's mind which, still today, makes the blood run cold. LaRouche said of that interview: "I compare my own knowledge from eyewitness reports of former inmates, including a close professional associate who had been in the camps even during the earlier, 1933-1940 interval, or the account of a leading psychoanalyst, Bruno Bettelheim, who had been a victim of the Nazi camps himself."

For more click below:
http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2009/3610soros_rumpstilt.html

-

بن رباح

01-Apr-09, 03:33

Source:
http://www.undiplomatic.net/2009/03/24/susan-rice-on-sudans-explulsion-of-humanitarian-groups/

“ In response to statement by Susan Rice on Sudan’s Explulsion of Humanitarian Groups”

On March 26th, 2009,

Phil said:

The African Union, Arab League, Islamic nations, G-77 nations 130 countries, China Russia are siding with Sudan against International Criminal Court. If the UN Security Council does not delay or rescind ICC criminal charges these nations will revoke the International Criminal Court charter. Susan Rice United Nations ambassador has overplayed her hands in setting up Omar al-Bashir for war crimes so that western corporations can cease control of Sudan’s natural resources. Susan Rice has working on ceasing Sudan’s natural resources sense the Clinton administration. Susan Rice was playing checkers against Sudan but the rest of the third world knew her plans and these nations played chess against Susan Rice and checkmated her. Susan Rice boss President Barack Obama now has to deal with Susan Rice abortion by appointing a special envoy retired Air Force General Scott Gration. Not good for Susan Rice a major failure less than a month on the job. Why Sudan is so important? In the last 5 years their oil deposits are 5 to 10 times larger than expected and huge high-yield deposits of Gold Silver Platinum Uranium and other precious metals were discovered. Sudan’s agricultural land has the richest red volcanic soil in the world but poor water distribution. A new dam was completed with 1 gigawatt of electricity and water for a massive water irrigation system. Soon Sudan will not need any food aid and will be a major food exporter.

Susan Rice foreign policy disaster

Should the African Union draw up list of undesirable people banned from the African continent it should be Susan Rice and her family at the top of the list. Susan Rice is responsible genocide in Rwanda supplying weapons Sudanese People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) which has waged a totally unsuccessful but nevertheless genocidal war against the Sudan government since 1983. While Susan Rice was engaging in highly publicized shuttling among Central African capitals, to demand that Congo allies Angola and Zimbabwe withdraw their troops from the Congo, in order to prevent a “wider conflagration, her underlings were in the process of vetting private contractors to give logistical support to the Ugandan- and Rwandan-backed rebels in the Congo. Every policy that Susan Rice has formulated has been a complete failure ending in millions of innocents Africans lives lost. If there is anyone who should be put on trial for war crimes in Africa it would be Susan Rice. If Susan Rice would be ever convicted of war crimes I would the first to pull the switch to save more millions of future Africans lives.
It is also clear that the West and the Zionist who were supplying weapons to several otherwise peaceful ethnic factions externally creating an ethnic and sectarian civil war in which none existed before the discovery oil and gas that instigated the conflict in the Congo and Sudan in the Darfur region. When the Chinese where willing to invest billions of US Dollar reserves in oil and gas drilling pipelines and infrastructure improvements such as railways roads water and irrigation projects hospitals schools universities in Sudan that’s when the conflict started. The Zionist created a sectarian war between religious and ethnic group’s civil warfare than casualties mounted and the Zionist controlled media and their political lackeys instantly blamed the conflict on the Sudanese government. The United States and the European Union threaten economic sanctions against Sudanese government for the sectarian ethnic groups’ civil warfare originally created by the Zionist with the support of United States and the European Union. Sudanese government is an innocent bystander by a Zionist created civil warfare. Sudanese government primary interest is industrializing Sudan into an economic power equal to South Africa or better.

-

بن رباح

03-Apr-09, 03:38

Zionists honoring the late Maj.-Gen. Orde Wingate of the British Army.

Wingate "The Friend" is Remembered, 65 Years Later

by Hillel Fendel

(IsraelNN.com) Moshe Arens, a former three-time Defense Minister and Foreign Minister, will be the Guest of Honor at a memorial ceremony honoring the late Maj.-Gen. Orde Wingate of the British Army in Mandatory Palestine.

The ceremony will take place on Tuesday afternoon at 2 PM, at the Ammunition Hill Museum in Jerusalem.

Wingate died 65 years ago today, on March 24, 1944. He is known in Israel as HaYedid, the friend, because of his devotion to the Jewish People and Zionism. This was a product of his upbringing in the Christian “Plymouth Brethren” movement, which believed strongly that the Jews must return to Israel. He carried a Bible with him at all times.

Wingate arrived in Palestine in 1936 as a British Captain in military intelligence. He quickly became known as somewhat of a curiosity for his appreciation and sympathy for the Jews; he himself later said that most British officers “disliked” them.

In light of the ongoing Arab intifiada campaign of riots, massacres and attacks organized against the Jews by Grand Mufti Hajj Amin Al Husseini, Wingate initiated a plan to fight back and deter the Arab attacks. In 1938, he submitted a report entitled, "Secret Appreciation of Possibilities of Night Movements by Armed Forces of the Crown - With Object of Putting an end to Terrorism in Northern Palestine." This plan became the basis for the British Special Night Squads (SNS).

The SNS was based primarily in Ein Harod in the Jezreel Valley – mainly because Wingate’s favorite Biblical figure, Gideon, had hand-picked a small army there with which he defeated a large Midianite enemy force.

The Wingate Strategy
Wingate’s strategy, later used in several important World War II battles, was to “carry the offensive to the enemy,” ambushing Arab saboteurs behind Arab lines and raiding border villages used as bases by the Mufti’s men. His methods and missions were generally crowned with success.

Wingate’s British forces worked together with the Haganah to fight the Arabs. Haganah commander Yitzhak Sadeh later said, "For some time we did the same things as Wingate, but on a smaller scale and with less skill. We followed parallel paths, until he came to us, and in him we found our leader."

Wingate’s personality and military genius made a profound impact on the Jewish defense forces in the 1930’s, and these in turn became the basis for today’s Israel Defense Forces. His contribution to Jewish defense in the Land of Israel is considered enormous.

No Entry to Palestine
His pro-Jewish positions ultimately led to his undoing, and his political enemies managed to have him transferred back to Britain in 1939; his passport was stamped, “No Entry to Palestine.” After leading World War II battles in Sudan, Ethiopia, India and Burma, and after being promoted to the rank of acting Maj.-Gen., he was killed in a plane crash behind Japanese lines in Burma.

General William Slim, who commanded the British 14th Army, wrote that Wingate was a “man of genius… a truly dynamic leader who combined vision and action, one of the few men in this war who was irreplaceable, who designed, raised, trained, and inspired his force, and placed it in the enemy's vitals.”

Wingate and others who died in the air crash were ultimately buried in Arlington National Cemetery in Washington. A memorial was erected to him in Britain, and The Wingate Institute in Netanya, Israel's National Center for Physical Education and Sport, is named for him. In addition, the Israeli youth village Yemin Orde was named for Wingate; founded in 1953 to accommodate Holocaust orphans and immigrant children, it is today home to more than 500 children from around the world.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/130588
-

بن رباح

04-Apr-09, 20:57

Soros' ICC Crime Against Africa

http://www.youtube.com/v/S98PNEh9Z3Q&hl=en&fs=1

-

بن رباح

09-Apr-09, 14:50

Untangling the False Narrative of a 'New Humanitarianism' for Darfur

http://ebooks-imgs.connect.com/product/400/000/000/000/000/130/709/400000000000000130709_s3.jpg

[Book Review] Mahmood Mamdani's 'Saviors and Survivors'

In his book "Saviors and Survivors," Mahmood Mamdani describes how US Secretary of State Colin Powell "made two pivotal presentations" during his term in Office under George Bush. The first presentation was his defense of the US government claim that there were Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) in Iraq, thus establishing the pretext for the illegal US invasion of Iraq. The second false narrative Powell was instrumental in creating had to do with the claim that there was genocide being carried out in Darfur.

With respect to Powell's claims of WMD in Iraq, much of the mainstream media in the US dutifully went along with the US government propaganda campaign by creating a false narrative to justify the US government's military attack on Iraq.
There has been the general acknowledgement by some of the mainstream media that their advocacy on behalf of the US government claim of WMD in Iraq was a serious failure of responsibility to the public. "Saviors and Survivors" demonstrates that the same failure has once again become the thrust of the US mainstream media's support for the unsubstantiated claim of genocide in Darfur, as the excuse for the pursuit of the President of Sudan by the International Criminal Court (ICC).

This false narrative, as Mamdani explains, looks at the violence in Darfur through the eyes of the War on Terror, which provides the language, the images and the sentiment for interpreting Darfur. "In doing so," writes Mamdani, "the War on Terror has displaced the history and politics of Darfur while providing the context to interpret and illuminate ongoing developments in Darfur. The more such an interpretation takes root, the more Darfur becomes not just an illustration of the grand narrative of the War on Terror but also a part of its justification." (p. 71) To show the fallacy of this grand narrative Mamdani sets out "to restore the historical and contemporary context of Darfur."

Only then will it be possible," he proposes, "to explain the dynamic that fuels the conflict and the motivation that drives it."

Mamdani traces the roots of the Darfur genocide narrative to statements in 2004 by Powell, George Bush, and a resolution passed by the US Congress. The narrative was then spread by the Save Darfur Coalition and the advertising agency it hired to popularize its version of reality. On June 30, 2004 George Bush proclaimed the violence in Darfur to be genocide. A few weeks later, on July 22 the US House and Senate passed resolutions declaring there to be genocide going on in Darfur. Then on Sept. 9, in testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Powell revised earlier statements where he had resisted administration pressure. In his September statement to the US Congress, he said that, "genocide has been committed in Darfur." He placed the responsibility on the Sudanese government."

Genocide, however, has a specific definition. This requires the intent to wipe out a race or national, ethnical, or religious group of people.

Though the violence in Darfur did not accord with this characterization, the Save Darfur coalition has endeavored to present the conflict in Darfur as one between Arab settlers and native Africans. But the people in Darfur do not fit into the categories presented by the Save Darfur coalition. The history of Darfur, as Mamdani demonstrates in his book, is one of a mixing of peoples, and of the transition of people from one livelihood to another. Prior to British colonial rule, there was a trend in Sudan away from tribes. British colonial rule introduced retribalization and the effort to create a form of identity for the Sudanese consistent with Britain's colonial aims. It introduced the concept of settlers and natives into what was an indigenous population where such concepts were nonexistent and inappropriate.

Even after its independence from Britain, Sudan has had a tumultuous past, partly due to the Cold War rivalry that utilized Darfur as an outpost of the struggles between the US, Israel and France against the former Soviet Union and Libya going on in Chad.

Mamdani shows how the civil war in Darfur, reaching a crisis in 1987-1989, preceded the coup that brought al-Bashir to the head the government of Sudan. Hence to place the blame for the civil war on al Bashir, as the Save Darfur Coalition, and the ICC Prosecutor Luis Ocampo have done, is contrary to the historical record. There is a serious problem in Darfur, explains Mamdani. As a consequence of the drought that began in the 1960s, the desert area of Sudan has steadily expanded, moving southward 100 kilometers. This led to a fight over land and political power resulting from the subsequent loss of both grazing land and farming land.

Along with the struggle over the right to the land or grazing rights, has been the struggle over the distribution of political power. The British colonial administration distributed the land and the right to administer the land to certain sectors of the population, thereby depriving other sectors not only of access to the land but also to political influence.

Mamdani describes how one of the manifestations of the false narrative presenting the conflict in Darfur as genocide, has been the way that the numbers of those killed in the years after 2003 has been misrepresented.

John Holmes, the Undersecretary General for Humanitarian Affairs at the United Nations is responsible for the widely quoted claim that 300,000 died in Darfur since 2003. In April 2008 Holmes explained the source of his figures. Holmes says that he took the figures from a 2006 study of 200,000 dead and extrapolated upwards under the assumption that the same number of people died every year since. "That figure must be much higher now, perhaps half as much again." (p. 272)

The problem with this kind of logic, Mamdani writes, is that the large number of deaths during the period between 2003 and 2004, which the World Health Organization estimates to be 70,000, diminished substantially in the subsequent period. He cites the examination of the exaggerated figures by the US government accounting office (GAO) in their study in 2006. They report that both the Save Darfur Coalition's numbers of reported deaths and other such high accounts were gathered by methods judged to be faulty.

The misrepresentations of the situation in Darfur becomes part of a phenomenon Mamdani calls "the New Humanitarianism." By substituting humanitarian aid for political reform and dependency for political empowerment, a new form of colonialism is being developed in Sudan. Another piece of this dependency is the imposition of the form of western justice via the International Criminal Court in the place of encouraging the internal settlement of the Darfur conflict, as the African Union is attempting to do.

Describing this phenomenon, Mamdani writes:

"By involving extraregional organizations such as the ICC, big powers were able to criminalize responsibility for human rights violations, thereby moving the focal point of the process away from the political to the criminal -- at the same time feeding expectations on all sides that its object would be punishment, not reconciliation." (p. 292)

The problem with such a thrust to the conflict, Mamdani explains is that: "This combination of African violations tried through non-African interventions introduced a conflict resolution mechanism whose consequences in the political domain were the same as those of the Cold War-era Structural Adjustment Programs (SAP) in the economic field: Those who made decisions did not have to live with their consequences, nor pay for them." (p. 292)

As part of his research, Mamdani describes how he worked with the African Union with their Darfur-Darfur Dialogue and Consultation (DDDC) office in 2006. This program was part of the effort by the African Union to investigate the forces that led to the conflict in Darfur. Mamdani explains how the DDDC "had been set up as a result of a provision in the Abuja agreement that mandated it to promote consultation with and among different groups in Darfur so as to nurture an internal reflection on how to move beyond a conflict-ridden present." (p. 13)

The opening phase of Mamdani's work for DDDC involved day long meetings in three different states of Darfur with representatives of five different groups, traditional leaders, political parties, representatives of IDPs (internally displaced persons) from different camps, local community-based organizations and academics and intellectuals.

Mamdani found that the DDDC process made it possible for those who weren't armed to have a voice.

The International Non Governmental Organizations (INGO) working in Darfur, however, were skeptical of the DDDC process. "Like the United Nations," Mamdani writes, "the INGOs seem to have no patience with an internal political process. For them, the people of Darfur are not citizens in a sovereign political process as much as wards in an open-ended international rescue operation. They are there to'save' Darfur, not to 'empower' it." (p. 297)

Mamdani has done a remarkable feat in untangling the set of categories introduced by the US government and the Save Darfur Coalition. The goal of their activity is not a peaceful solution to the Darfur conflict, but it is, he explains, to advocate for military intervention. Even more remarkable, however, is the service his book does to provide a basis to understand an accurate narrative of what is at stake in Darfur and how the current conflict needs to be treated in a nonpartisan and impartial fashion to be able to find the means for a political solution.

The ICC indictment and then warrant issued for the arrest of the President of Sudan, for al-Bashir, is contrary to what is needed for such a political solution. Though the book "Saviors and Survivors" was written before the ICC issued a warrant for the arrest of al Bashir, the book challenges the false narrative which criminalizes justice and instead examines the historical and political roots which it is critical to understand in order to find the principles for a solution to the Darfur conflict.

http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?at_code=436809&no=385005&rel_no=1

-

بن رباح

14-Apr-09, 01:10

RESIST THE IMPERIALIST MANEUVER TO DESTABILIZE SUDAN
BY INDICTING PRESIDENT OMAR HASAN AHMAD AL BASHIR

http://www.northstarcompass.org/nsc0801/mukherjee.jpg

By: Manik Mukherjee

Manik Mukherjee, General Secretary of the International Anti-imperialist and People's Solidarity Coordinating Committee (IAPSCC), has issued the following statement condemning the indictment of President Omar Hasan Ahmad Al Bashir of the Republic of Sudan by the International Criminal Court.

The International Anti-imperialist and People's Solidarity Coordinating Committee (IAPSCC) strongly condemns the recent action of the International Criminal Court of issuing a warrant of arrest of H.E. Omar Hasan Ahmad Al Bashir, President of the Republic of Sudan.

This is an assault on the sovereignty of an independent state, and is nothing but an imperialist conspiracy against Sudan which is following a policy of development not guided by the imperialist dictates. Sudan has not granted the imperialist powers access to its rich oil resources and opposed the US-led war against Iraq and its subsequent occupation. This has infuriated USA and its allies who are bent on destabilizing the country. They fanned up ethnic conflicts in Sudan and militarily trained, aided and incited the rebel groups to fight against the Sudan Government. It is a common imperialist strategy to foment mistrust and division among the different ethnic groups in a country, to instigate civil wars, and to allow these to continue through direct intervention and supporting one group against the other. Afterwards they cry hoarse on 'war crimes' and 'crimes against humanity', and demand that the perpetrators must be tried and punished. We witnessed it in Cambodia, in Rwanda, in Yugoslavia. And everywhere such charges were leveled against that side which was most opposed to the imperialists.

On an entirely motivated and false allegation about possession of weapons of mass destruction USA and its allies invaded and occupied Iraq and devastated the country. We witness a similar imperialist policy in action against Sudan - a conspiracy is being hatched against the country. After instigating the internal conflict the imperialist powers are now vocal about 'genocide' in Darfur. They have launched a propaganda blitz on the sufferings of the people in Darfur and are calling for direct military intervention and a permanent presence of Western powers in Sudan to monitor the situation.

The imperialist powers are using the International Criminal Court as their tool to destabilize independent countries and bring them under their control. They have done this in the past and they are doing it now. We emphasize that the Sudanese people are the sole custodians of their country. It is they alone who can chart out a course for tackling all their internal problems without any foreign interference or any external pressure. Sudanese people do not need to be taught by the imperialists how to protect human rights.

The IAPSCC affirms its solidarity with the Sudanese people in their fight against imperialism to protect the sovereignty of their country. The IAPSCC calls upon the freedom-loving people all over the world to come out in protest against the imperialist maneuvers and organize movements to foil their conspiracy.

-

بن رباح

16-Apr-09, 21:28

-

I have been to Sudan: What Darfur Genocide?!

http://www.youtube.com/v/kcbNa3KpceY&hl=en&fs=1

-

بن رباح

09-May-09, 12:44

The Agenda/ Israel and Sudan/07/ 05/ 2009

http://www.youtube.com/v/jJjYg1nSfM8&hl=en&fs=1

بن رباح

23-May-09, 13:28

-

In case you missed it...

Darfur - George Galloway

http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x1i9m2_darfur-george-galloway_news&related=1

.بن رباح.

24-Jun-09, 17:12

Zionists meddling in Sudan
:evil::evil::evil::evil::evil::evil::evil::evil:

Jewish Darfur activists see White House moving in right direction

http://multimedia.jta.org/images/multimedia/ruth-messinger_0/Ruth_in_Chad__m.jpg

American Jewish World Service President Ruth Messinger, shown on a visit
to Chad, says the administration's policy objectives on Darfur are the right ones.

Source (http://jta.org/news/article/2009/06/22/1006049/jewish-darfur-actvists-feel-white-house-moving-in-right-direction)

-

*Deekuei

24-Jun-09, 23:20

Is that what Saleh Gosh told your??

Karkar

25-Jun-09, 01:24

Folks! Let me put it in a short, concise, crytal clear way. Please! don't misunderstand me.

1. There's a plot to establish One World Government, it's a fact, and a fool-
proved thruth.

2. Protocols of Elders of Zion, is fact that can be proven by analyzing current issues.

3. Those who are implementing this New World Order, don't care about any of you, they don't care about jews, Arab, Africans, Asians or who ever. They don't give a dumn about humanity. The way they work, they speak to you by targeting your sub-conscience mind and not your conscience mind as many of you believe. This is a war fought on sub-conscience mind. That's why many of you don't understand it. and I don't blame any of you, for you're blinded souls, poor innocent souls with no clue of what's going on.

4. People like Bashir, Ahamedinajed, Sadam Hussien are just mere pawns. I keep telling you guys they're all on the same team. Example! Ahamedinajed is an illuminati Agent who supposed to pose as an opponent to Israel and the so called Western Countries. That's why he was making hateful statements toward Israel or jews, therefore, giving Israel legitimate reason to attack. A case of Problem, reaction, solution, Repeated over and over. Hard, military power against Iran has been abandoned for it will make the one World Government plot more apparent; so they switch it to soft power as you it being press on Iran right now.

So Bashir and Ahamedinajed are telling the truth, but they're not telling it for the benefit of you but rather for the benefit of the elites who are working hard, day & night, no day off, to establish New world Order. There's no way you can explain the world wide current crisis other then for the porpose of establishing a totalitarian world government. When you take a closer look it, Africans, Arabs, Whites, Asians, all races are dying, are being kill, for what? you ask yourselves. I wish there's a way I can convey it simply so you can understand it. Try to! It will make it easy for you to put togather this amazing puzzle that we're given.

.بن رباح.

25-Jun-09, 03:47

Is that what Saleh Gosh told your??

That is what I know. I don't need someone else to tell me anything.

Now, you tell me what on earth brings jews all the way to the boarders between Sudan and Chad eh?

Jews are not Chadians or Sudanese, so what the hell is that Zionist women doing there eh?

Do you have an answer??

-

بـلال

17-Aug-09, 17:22

Jewish leaders press D.C.-bound Mubarak on Sudan

:roll::roll::roll::roll:

August 16, 2009

WASHINGTON (JTA) -- One hundred Jewish clerics and organizational leaders signed a letter reproaching the Egyptian president for hosting his Sudanese counterpart.

The letter comes on the eve of Hosni Mubarak's White House visit.

"We wish to express our deep concern that Sudanese president Omar Hassan al-Bashir recently visited Egypt, despite the fact that the International Criminal Court has issued a warrant for his arrest in connection with the genocide in Darfur," said the letter handed Sunday to the Egyptian Embassy in Washington. "As Jewish leaders living in the aftermath of the Holocaust, we are keenly aware of the need for swift action against the perpetrators of genocide. Bashir should be brought to justice, not treated as if he is a respected international leader."

The letter, organized by the David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies, was signed by rabbis affiliated with the Reform, Conservative and Orthodox streams as well as lay Jewish leaders. Most of the signatories are American, although some are Canadian and Israeli.

Mubarak is visiting Washington starting Monday as part of President Obama's push to accelerate a resumption of Israeli-Arab peace talks. The White House wants Egypt to help press the Palestinians back to the table and to persuade other Arab nations to make conciliatory gestures to Israel.

Mubarak will meet Monday morning with U.S. Jewish leaders.

Source:
h*ttp://jta.org/news/article/2009/08/16/1007282/jewish-leaders-press-mubarak-on-sudan-on-eve-of-dc-visit

(())

Aviator1

17-Aug-09, 22:51

...drama goes on. You'd think now there's threat but wait 'til South becomes a country. Darfurians will have a true friend, like Ethiopia and Uganda to Southerners. Israel embassy will be visible and enemies of wannabes will be welcome in South Sudan. To avoid these, NiF must seek peaceful separation :geek:

بـلال

18-Aug-09, 17:27

Hey Mr.-used-to-have-a-giraffe-avatar,

...drama goes on. You'd think now there's threat but wait 'til South becomes a country. Darfurians will have a true friend, like Ethiopia and Uganda to Southerners. Israel embassy will be visible and enemies of wannabes will be welcome in South Sudan. To avoid these, NiF must seek peaceful separation :geek:

No wonder, the women on your new avatar are white!!

How white are you now?... Coconut??

(())

بن رباح

21-Jan-10, 04:25

....

IsraeHell Settlers still have their eyes on Sudan

-
-
-
-

Darfur war is the Shabbat subject in synagogues this weekend

War in Darfur will be the subject in synagogues across Canada this weekend in a unified Shabbat

****

The Jewish people have long known persecution. Both scripture and the history books tell of it, so they carry a special burden to help those being victimized today in Darfur.

That's the message Rabbi Baruch Frydman-Kohl will deliver to his congregation at Beth Tzedec Synagogue, in Toronto, on Saturday. It's part of a nationwide effort to dedicate this weekend's Shabbat services to Darfur.

The idea, says Frydman-Kohl, is to draw a direct link between the killings there and the Holocaust.

"We don't want our words `Never Again' to just mean never again for us," Frydman-Kohl says. "We want never again, period."

Developing a sermon for the service will not be difficult, he says. From the Torah, he'll talk about Moses, the Jews in slavery in Egypt and liberation. From the history books, he'll talk about the Holocaust and the 6 million Jews killed by the Nazis. And he'll relate it all to the current situation in Darfur, Sudan, where for seven years a government-backed militia has killed more than 400,000 people and forced some 2 million from their homes in what many have termed a modern-day genocide.

"The genocide in Darfur has been the most pressing international humanitarian concern of the past few years," says Benjamin Shinewald, national executive director of the Canadian Jewish Congress, which is helping co-ordinate and promote this weekend's Shabbat activities.

Rabbis across the country have been asked to dedicate their services to Darfur, to encourage their congregations to get involved, and to hand out pamphlets from Darfur organizations – including the CJC Darfur Action Committee. In Ottawa, a girl having her Bat Mitzvah will dedicate her address to Darfur.

It's the first time in about nine years that the CJC has pushed for unified, nationwide Shabbat. The last time, the effort was to help free Syrian Jews. Shinewald says this is the first time such action has been taken for a non-Jewish group.

But because of their own history of persecution, Jews feel an affinity to those targeted in Darfur, while the basic tenets of their faith compel them to take action, he says. He hopes the Shabbat will raise awareness of those suffering in Darfur.

Raising awareness can often be difficult, says David McDonald, head of the Global Studies department at Queen's University. With any story about Africa, the problems run so deep and the issues are so complex, it can often be difficult to translate them for everyday consumption in newspapers or on television.

Add to that the miniscule amount that students are taught about Africa in school, and there is often little engagement on issues such as Darfur among either the public or the media, he says.

"Educational systems in Canada are very Euro-centric," he says, adding the media often prefer simpler stories, such as hurricanes or earthquakes that are easier to explain.

"They just jump to the latest hot spot," he says.

Frydman-Kohl says the only way to break such a pattern is to keep talking about Darfur, which is the purpose of the Shabbat focus this coming weekend.

Source of this Zionist news is here (http://www.thestar.com/living/article/752361--darfur-war-is-the-shabbat-subject-in-synagogues-this-weekend)

-

بن رباح

25-Jan-10, 04:34

...

CJC dedicates a Shabbat to Darfur

Canadian Jewish Congress partnering with
synagogues across Canada to dedicate portion of this Shabbat's service to
stopping genocide by focusing on what Canadian Jewish community can do
to help

Dan Verbin
Published: 01.22.10, 07:39 / Israel Jewish Scene

As part of its ongoing effort to ensure a definitive end to the genocide in Darfur, Canadian Jewish Congress is partnering with synagogues across Canada on January 22/23 for Darfur Shabbat.

Darfur Shabbat asks rabbis and congregants from one end of the country to the other to dedicate a portion of their regular Shabbat service to stopping the genocide for good by focusing on what the Canadian Jewish community can do to help.

“We think that now is a great time to heighten and redouble our efforts to end the genocide so that it is once and for all done,” said Benjamin Shinewald, CJC’s National Executive Director and General Counsel.

While there have been encouraging developments in the Darfur region in the past six months, pressure must be kept up. To remain silent while there is still violence going on would go against a major tenet of Judaism not to ignore the suffering of others. It would also ignore our responsibility to perform tikkun olam (“to repair the world”).

"The idea was to get rabbis from across Canada, and to get rabbis from the three streams of Judaism,” Shinewald said.

Darfur Shabbat is taking place only a few days before the 65th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, which symbolizes the end of the Holocaust. CJC’s intent is to use the date to say that the world’s apathy to the suffering of the Jews during the Holocaust means that as Jews we must speak out against what is going on in Darfur.

"Given our historical experience throughout centuries of anti-Semitism and the Holocaust, it's incumbent upon us to act so that ‘Never Again’ really does mean never again and not again and again,” he said.

The CJC Darfur Action Committee, which came up with the idea of the program, is also hoping that rabbis will use their sermons to speak out about Darfur.

“We have a positive obligation in Jewish law not to sit back and do nothing when others are suffering, but to act,” he said.

Urgent humanitarian challenge

A flyer is available on CJC’s website that participating synagogues can hand out to congregants.

The first page lists three easy things that Canadian Jews can do to help bring an end to the genocide. One: Call 1-800-GENOCIDE to lobby Canadian politicians with talking points. Two: Watch the video at www.standforthedead.com and purchase a kit. Three: Give tzedakah at www.warchild.ca.

The second sheet lists the talking points.

Darfur is one of the most urgent humanitarian challenges on the planet right now, Shinewald explained. “There's an obligation on us, the way there's an obligation on every person on the face of the earth, when faced with such horrific humanitarian tragedy.”

For years, CJC has been at the forefront of Darfur activism, campaigning and lobbying to put an end to genocide. They have partnered with celebrity activist Mia Farrow, lobbied Members of Parliament to wear green ribbons against genocide in Darfur on Yom HaShoah, used the 2008 election to ask federal politicians to commit to increasing Canada’s efforts to end the genocide, and authored a book titled “Darfur: A Jewish Response” available for free on their website.

Shinewald stressed that the Darfur Action Committee is always seeking out new members from all areas of the community.

“We have volunteers ranging from undergrad students to retirees, from Vancouver to Montreal to the Maritimes,” he said. “Our ultimate objective is to put ourselves out of business. We want to stop advocating for an end to genocide in Darfur because we want the genocide to end."

Source (http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3837634,00.html)

.

بن رباح

21-Apr-10, 15:31

.

Hamas won the elections in SUDAN

:clap::clap::clap::clap:

_ _ _ _ _

AJWS joins critique of White House on Sudan vote

April 21, 2010

WASHINGTON (JTA) -- The American Jewish World Service joined other human rights groups in criticizing the Obama administration for not exacting consequences on Sudan for elections seen as flawed.

In its statement Tuesday on this month's Sudan elections, the White House said that "political rights and freedoms were circumscribed throughout the electoral process, there were reports of intimidation and threats of violence in South Sudan, ongoing conflict in Darfur did not permit an environment conducive to acceptable elections, and inadequacies in technical preparations for the vote resulted in serious irregularities."

The White House said it "regretted" the problems and added that it remains committed to helping to implement the remainder of a comprehensive peace agreement that is to culminate in a referendum next year on independence.

The human rights groups depicted the White House's statement as ineffectual, noting earlier pledges by Obama to hold President Omar al-Bashir accountable should he not abide by the terms of the peace agreement. AJWS joined the Save Darfur Coalition, Enough and Stop Genocide Now in pressing Obama to do more.

Their joint statement called on the administration to implement "pressure and consequences to reduce the risk of full-scale war and prevent further manipulation by spoilers in Khartoum during the run-up to the January 2011 referendum on independence for Southern Sudan."

In a separate statement, AJWS President Ruth Messinger said "The administration must demonstrate that peace in Sudan is a priority worthy of the continued personal attention of the president, vice president and secretary of state."

Souce (http://www.jta.org/news/article/2010/04/21/1011676/ajws-joines-critique-of-white-house-on-sudan-vote)

.

بن رباح

26-Sep-10, 15:35

.

Made in Canada

http://wecantpaint.com/log/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/somalia1.jpg

John Goddard Staff Reporter
Published On Sat Sep 25 2010

Every gallon of oil exported from Sudan contains slightly more than one teaspoon of human blood, author Ezra Levant calculates metaphorically.

Oil exports pay for the genocide in Sudan’s Darfur region, he argues.

If 300,000 Darfurians died in a two-year period, as the United Nations calculates, and if Sudan exported 350,000 barrels a day, as dockets show, that works out to 850 barrels of oil per killing.

At an average of 185 ounces of blood per body, that’s one fifth of an ounce per barrel.

“Sudan exports blood oil,” Levant said in a recent interview at his Toronto publisher’s office, playing on the phrase “blood diamonds,” meaning those from war-torn African countries.

“Canada does not.”

In his book Ethical Oil: The Case for Canada’s Oil Sands, Levant reframes the debate on the oilsands of northern Alberta.

The region boasts the world’s largest single known petroleum deposit, enough to keep the entire world in oil for 100 years.

The problem is that the oil is mixed with sand and clay. Extracting and refining it requires energy, resulting in 15 per cent higher greenhouse gas emissions than the relatively accessible, light crude of Saudi Arabia.

Critics say those emissions contribute to global warming, making oilsands extraction environmentally unsound. And in Levant’s words, they contend that oilsands extraction “has moral failures . . . is inherently evil . . . (and) so morally repugnant that any debate about (the oilsands) is over before it starts.”

Levant disagrees.

As a Calgary lawyer and former publisher of Western Standard magazine, he enjoys a reputation for being right-wing, but argues he is actually making the left, liberal case for the oilsands in this book.

Levant argues not that the oilsands are good because they keep the wheels of capitalism spinning, but because they produce a morally superior product to all other oil sources when economic justice, minority rights, freedom from oppression and, yes, even environmentalism are taken into account.

“I won’t tell you those values are wrong; I’m going to appeal to those values,” he said in the interview. “I’m not disputing that you care about peace. I’m counting on it. I’m not disputing economic justice; I’m betting on it.”

Compare Alberta to Saudi Arabia — “a medieval, theocratic, fascist, terrorist state,” he says. Being the victim of a rape in Saudi Arabia is a crime, he reminds readers, and 15 of the 19 terrorists in the 9/11 attacks came from there.

Until 2003, Saudi Arabia served as the biggest oil supplier to the United States, shipping 630 million barrels a day compared with 560 million from Canada, a 12 per cent difference.

The next year, partly thanks to the oilsands, Canada became the top U.S. supplier. By 2008, Canada was selling 715 million barrels a day to the United States, 30 per cent more than Saudi Arabia.

To have a friendly, peace-loving, democratic country supplying the United States with oil is a good thing, he argues.

If country-of-origin labelling applied to oil the way it does to food and clothes, Levant says, American motorists would ignore the gas pump marked “Saudi Arabia” and line up at one marked “Canada.”

Levant runs through what he calls the “rogues’ gallery” of oil-producing states:
Russia: a brutally repressive state waging war in Chechnya and South Ossetia. Between 2000 and 2007, 21 Russian journalists were murdered on the job.

Nigeria: a kleptocracy whose citizens are dirt-poor while their leaders have Swiss bank accounts. Natural-gas flaring gives Nigerian oil one of the highest carbon footprints in the world.

Iran. “How does Iran’s treatment of women compare to Fort McMurray’s?” Levant asks rhetorically of Alberta’s main oilsands town. As a single mother living with her fiancé, the town’s top politician, Mayor Melissa Blake, “would be stoned to death in Iran,” he says.

Venezuela. Mexico. Sudan. “Canada is hands-down the most ethical major exporter of oil in the world,” Levant says.

In his sweeping study, Levant finds hypocrisy in ethical funds, misinformation in a cancer scare, blindness toward China’s environmental scandals, untallied carbon emissions in supertanker shipping and an unbalanced perception of the oilsands’ risk to birds, after 1,600 birds drowned in a tailings pond when the scarecrow system failed.

In Wisconsin, a communications tower killed 30,000 birds in a single night, he says. California’s Altamont wind farm kills 10,000 birds annually.

Oilsands environmental technology improves continuously, Levant says. Between 1990 and 2009, greenhouse gas emissions fell 38 per cent. Fresh water use dropped from 3.5 barrels per barrel of bitumen in 1985 to half a barrel today.

Fort McMurray might not be utopia, he says at his publisher’s office.

“But the air,” he says, “is fresher than in Toronto.”

Source (http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/article/865900--made-in-canada)

Ezra Levant on Glenn Beck (http://www.youtube.com/v/5E0wuJvFo1k&autoplay=1)

Israeli connection?? (http://www.youtube.com/v/7etKDh_kkXk&&autoplay=1)

.